Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3111213
Results 121 to 125 of 125

Thread: Official Journalism Awards Thread

  1. #121
    Senior Member Swamp Fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Carolinas and sometimes Virginia
    Posts
    16,074
    Quote Originally Posted by Swamp Fox View Post
    I challenge you to find a Frenchman who wasn't in the Resistance ...
    Quote Originally Posted by Swamp Fox View Post
    This knucklehead doesn't count, so don't even try ... see voo play

    But technically, he *wasn't* in the Resistance ...

    I'll admit that.

    I'm tough, but fair.


  2. #122
    Senior Member DParker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    TX, where the chili has no beans
    Posts
    6,684
    Don't go ninja-in' nobody don't need ninja-in'.
    - Diemon Dave

  3. #123
    Senior Member Swamp Fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Carolinas and sometimes Virginia
    Posts
    16,074
    LOL ...

  4. #124
    Senior Member Swamp Fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Carolinas and sometimes Virginia
    Posts
    16,074
    I enjoy all the enlightened opinion leaders, students of history, Resistance enthusiasts and anti-Nazis in the media. Thank God we have their example to follow.


    As prejudices go, anti-Semitism can sometimes be hard to pin down, but on Thursday the opinion pages of The New York Times international edition provided a textbook illustration of it.

    Except that The Times wasn’t explaining anti-Semitism. It was purveying it.

    It did so in the form of a cartoon, provided to the newspaper by a wire service and published directly above an unrelated column by Tom Friedman, in which a guide dog with a prideful countenance and the face of Benjamin Netanyahu leads a blind, fat Donald Trump wearing dark glasses and a black yarmulke. Lest there be any doubt as to the identity of the dog-man, it wears a collar from which hangs a Star of David.

    Here was an image that, in another age, might have been published in the pages of Der Stürmer. The Jew in the form of a dog. The small but wily Jew leading the dumb and trusting American. The hated Trump being Judaized with a skullcap. The nominal servant acting as the true master. The cartoon checked so many anti-Semitic boxes that the only thing missing was a dollar sign.

    The image also had an obvious political message: Namely, that in the current administration, the United States follows wherever Israel wants to go. This is false — consider Israel’s horrified reaction to Trump’s announcement last year that he intended to withdraw U.S. forces from Syria — but it’s beside the point. There are legitimate ways to criticize Trump’s approach to Israel, in pictures as well as words. But there was nothing legitimate about this cartoon.

    So what was it doing in The Times?

    For some Times readers — or, as often, former readers — the answer is clear: The Times has a longstanding Jewish problem, dating back to World War II, when it mostly buried news about the Holocaust, and continuing into the present day in the form of intensely adversarial coverage of Israel. The criticism goes double when it comes to the editorial pages, whose overall approach toward the Jewish state tends to range, with some notable exceptions, from tut-tutting disappointment to thunderous condemnation.

    For these readers, the cartoon would have come like the slip of the tongue that reveals the deeper institutional prejudice. What was long suspected is, at last, revealed.

    The real story is a bit different, though not in ways that acquit The Times. The cartoon appeared in the print version of the international edition, which has a limited overseas circulation, a much smaller staff, and far less oversight than the regular edition. Incredibly, the cartoon itself was selected and seen by just one midlevel editor right before the paper went to press.

    An initial editor’s note acknowledged that the cartoon “included anti-Semitic tropes,” “was offensive,” and that “it was an error of judgment to publish it.” On Sunday, The Times issued an additional statement saying it was “deeply sorry” for the cartoon and that “significant changes” would be made in terms of internal processes and training.

    In other words, the paper’s position is that it is guilty of a serious screw-up but not a cardinal sin. Not quite.

    The problem with the cartoon isn’t that its publication was a willful act of anti-Semitism. It wasn’t. The problem is that its publication was an astonishing act of ignorance of anti-Semitism — and that, at a publication that is otherwise hyper-alert to nearly every conceivable expression of prejudice, from mansplaining to racial microaggressions to transphobia.

    Imagine, for instance, if the dog on a leash in the image hadn’t been the Israeli prime minister but instead a prominent woman such as Nancy Pelosi, a person of color such as John Lewis, or a Muslim such as Ilhan Omar. Would that have gone unnoticed by either the wire service that provides the Times with images or the editor who, even if he were working in haste, selected it?

    The question answers itself. And it raises a follow-on: How have even the most blatant expressions of anti-Semitism become almost undetectable to editors who think it’s part of their job to stand up to bigotry?


    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/28/o...n-nytimes.html

  5. #125
    Senior Member Swamp Fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Carolinas and sometimes Virginia
    Posts
    16,074


Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3111213

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •